Hacker News Reader

Comment by Gonsalu | Hacker News Reader

FAST? It's still .NET. Regarding you example, I'd much rather write

  value = dict.get('foo', 'default')

in IronPython.

View on HN

I'm not familiar with python - does it have some magic global sentinel value to indicate "not found"? Or how do you handle that case with that 1 line of code?

Secondly, saying "it's still .NET" is similar to saying "it's still x64". The F# compiler does a lot of transforms on code that the C# compiler does not. In some cases, this can result in better IL and better JIT'd code. Also, having inlining support at the compiler level can be very handy sometimes.

Yes, good points MichaelGG, one of the really nice things about the F# compiler is that it can inline higher order functions, so if you pass a function to another it may create a custom piece of code with your passed function inlined. I wasn't sure if you were referring to C style inline support, which C# does have (in the .NET JIT). Like C the inlining in F# is just a suggestion to the compiler.

So you can write code that is optimal from a design point of view (abstractions, etc) and the compiler will turn it into optimal code from a performance point of view.

See http://flyingfrogblog.blogspot.com/2009/07/ocaml-vs-f-burrow... for a much better explanation.

I don't think that F#'s inline is just a suggestion. Hat types (^a) aka statically resolved type variables, require inline methods to actually be inline. Same way you can't have inlined recursive functions.

You can nest a recursive function inside a non-recursive one and inline that.

> I'm not familiar with python - does it have some magic global sentinel value to indicate "not found"?

No, it has a different method for failable search. The purpose of `get` is specifically to handle "provide a default value in case the key is not found".

> Or how do you handle that case with that 1 line of code?

dict[key]

You can also use defaultdict[0], or define the __missing__() method[1] yourself on a dictionary you receive from someone else's code. In either of these cases the "not found" value will be whatever you decide it should be.

[0]: http://docs.python.org/library/collections.html#collections.... [1]: http://docs.python.org/library/stdtypes.html#dict

  namespace Org.DictionaryExtensions =
    type Dictionary<'T> with
     member x.get(key,defaultValue) = 
       match x.TryGetValue(key) with
       | (true,val) -> val
       | (false,_) -> defaultValue

There fixed that for you, now you can do, dict.get("foo","defaultvalue") in whatever CLR language you like. :)

As for fast and knocking .NET you're not seriously suggesting python are you? Runtime method lookup is not exactly what I think when thinking fast.

I wasn't knocking .NET; I had the idea that coding something in C# or F# would result in the same IL output, which, after reading MichaelGG's reply, I realized was completely wrong...

Regarding Python speed, I know it's pretty slow, especially the IronPython implementation.

Upvoted because that's good code reuse in the scenario that you only want to store a default value, and I can see why you replied to the commenter with it. It doesn't necessarily work so well in the scenario where you want to perform some operation if there isn't a value. Or if default needs to be computed. I'm assuming that the idiomatic way of doing this in python would be:

try: value = dict['foo'] except KeyNotFound: value = do_something_interesting() dict['foo'] = value

If you could pass a function in as a default of course this point is moot!

See collections.defaultdict in the standard library -- http://docs.python.org/library/collections.html#collections....

> It doesn't necessarily work so well in the scenario where you want to perform some operation if there isn't a value.

No, but that's not what the example he replied to does.

  (setf value (gethash "foo" dict "default"))

Reply on news.ycombinator.com