Measuring Traffic Manipulation on Twitter
comprop.oii.ox.ac.uk
comprop.oii.ox.ac.uk
I don't understand how the platform owners don't put a stop to this when it's this easy to detect.
I guess engagement is a key metric that looks good to shareholders and advertisers.
Detecting and monitoring the bots provides a possibly similar outcome, but t with the advantage that he platform knows the bots. If there are bots with way, the platform would probably prefer the option that allowes them to know who the bots are.
The middle ground is basic auto detection/bans for simple abuse and infrequent ban waves for the rest, where bots are detected and all banned together. This makes it hard for the writers to understand which signals have them away and gives them the disincentive of uncertainty. This is popular in gaming, where bot and cheat farms are detected and studied by they platform for up to several months before bans are handed out.
But there's no way for Twitter (or any other platform) to determine who's actually responsible. "False flags" (framing a user by buying followers for them, or running bots themselves to follow them) are not uncommon, so the best Twitter can do is remove the followers and improve bot detection capabilities. This lets users continually pay for more bots to replenish their periodically purged follower count.