That might be how you use the term, but that might more correctly called "false news". In common parlance, "fake news" refers to an overall pattern of filtering and narrative-pushing such that consuming lots of these stories (possibly each of them factual) will leave the reader with gross misapprehensions about the world.
[0] http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2019/01/majority-americans-we...
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fake_news
[2] https://www.npr.org/sections/alltechconsidered/2016/11/23/50...
It's useful for non-controversial stuff. I love to peruse it, I love to quote from it. But it can't possibly be trusted for anything as topical as "Fake News".
I love the Michael Scott comment:
Wikipedia is the best thing ever. Anyone in the world can write anything they want about any subject. So you know you are getting the best possible information.
(For those who aren't familiar with the US version of The Office: Michael Scott is not meant to be taken literally).