There is no evidence of critical thinking or questioning whether all these claims are correct.

I'm afraid that I don't understand your comment. Let's look at some reports from the mainstream media (not this scary 'net' that you mention):

Images of Shah Rukh Kahn, one of the biggest Bollywood stars, were leaked. http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/2684287/bollywood_s...

At least one penis joke was made, and it led to one TSA agent assaulting another. http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-504083_162-20004436-504083.html

There has been criticism as to the radiation dosage model used to evaluate machine safety. Safety studies have been carried out in animal models. http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=1268330...

Security theatre. Let's think this through: The people who are smuggling bombs onto aircraft are suicide bombers. Drug mules swallow condoms full of cocaine to bring product over the border. Do you think it's considerably more difficult to eat a condom full of semtex? The nude-o-scope can't inspect the contents of your stomach. Abdullah Hassan Al Aseery put PETN in his anus. How do you counter that threat model?

Where do you see an absence of critical thinking?