what's the reason it's boycotted? appeal to authority isn't very informative for those not keeping up with this stuff
i.e. Why should people have to pay to view the results of what is often publicly funded research? Even more so why should researchers have to pay to publish work that the publishers profit off of but the researchers don't.
Or maybe I’m just taking crazy pills..
There will always be someone who defends publishers based on not knowing anything about how scientific publishing works.
I would even venture to say that most researchers will be against the idea of paid reviews, just like Amazon found out that paid product reviews are a very bad idea.
You are. Where did you ever get the idea that nature pays for reviews?