> However the idea/phenomenon of once something is in the science column it is no longer in the religion column doesn't really make any logical sense to me.

It doesn’t mean the phenomenon is so longer relevant to religion, or that religions can’t offer some insights into how the phenomenon might effect humans, but it certainly obviated the need for religion to invoke the supernatural to explain the mechanics of the phenomenon. Which is, after all, what the “God of the gaps” perspective pertains to.