That's not a good analogy. In this case, people aren't being stolen from, they are freely giving it away for someone else to do as they wish.
Additionally, "theft" as you put it, in this case, doesn't affect the original property owner.
Additionally, "theft" as you put it, in this case, doesn't affect the original property owner.
Proclamations of rights aren't really useful if they don't have means for enforcing those rights are not taken away.