Your comment was meant in jest, but I believe this article was written in the context of the push for "structured programming". The "structured" in that was selected for a reason: What business wants to say that it's making
unstructured programs? It sounds chaotic, unmaintainable, and like a ticking time bomb. So the people responsible for pushing the ideas of structured programming selected a name that made it hard to argue against.
EDIT: Double checked the date of the original article, it was 1971. Right in the middle of the Structured Programming push by Dijkstra and others (who is cited in the article).