Hacker News Reader

I didn't really like the place. It places a _huge_ premium on design vs functionality in some sections. I mean, sure, it looks cool, but the cost is away from something this time instead of mutually existing.

View on HN

I'm interested to hear what you think the functional shortcomings of the space are. Also, you are making a false dichotomy of function and design. Functionality is an essential part of design.

I agree with you. But what is the correct word for architectural features that detract from functionality? They're often called "design" whether we like it or not.

Whatever they ought to be called instead, it looks to me like the space is not lacking in them--curves and inconvenient angles in particular.

You might be talking about purely aesthetic design. But I disagree, I've been to the place and it was a very functional and easy-to-understand building architecturally. But also beautiful and calming. Aesthetics are a very important and underrated aspect of architecture and I'm glad that money has been spent on this project. When the architecture is not only functional but also aesthetically pleasing, people tend to use it more. And what good comes from a library that nobody would want to go to?

Reply on news.ycombinator.com