I do wish it were more politically acceptable for politicians to adopt this mindset. Without espousing a side of "Democrat" vs "Republican", it feels like the world views admitting that you are incorrect as a sign of weakness, or "flip-flopping",
I do wish it were more politically acceptable for politicians to adopt this mindset. Without espousing a side of "Democrat" vs "Republican", it feels like the world views admitting that you are incorrect as a sign of weakness, or "flip-flopping",
It's not really a liberal or conservative thing, either. Someone making a passionate progressive speech is going to appeal to those inclined that way more than someone making a careful, nuanced progressive argument.
Politicians know this and so will always hedge towards appearing decisive and "strong".
I try to take the approach that everything I think I know is correct, but that I need to reevaluate when presented with new information, and I constantly look for new information to disprove what I know. The subtle difference here is that I assume I'm right, which gives me confidence. I used to doubt everything, which led me to being very noncommittal and unconfident.
It's important to question your assumptions, but it's harmful if you completely distrust them.
That’s something on which I have never actually settled my opinion. One month I conclude “nope, unit testing takes too long and offers no net benefit”. The next, I switch - “unit testing is glorious and helps push errors down significantly”.
Part of the reason why my answer to most questions is “I don’t know” or “It depends”.