A while ago, I conjectured that Land Rent Theory doesn't properly factor in live-in servants, something I suspect would minorly affect the mathematics of it. By how much on a micro-scale, I can't say, but based on this an the above article, a more macro-scale-economical thought follows, on a more interesting level of abstraction than 'communal land prices':
If we consider an area a given Uber-for-X service operates in, and given that the employees there finance their living within that area by working for those companies, don't those employees then map to them effectively becoming live in-servants of the entire group living within the respective areas of operations?
You know what live in-servants used to get called in some circumstances?
If you have an immediate answer to that question, you might want to think about whatever answer you immediately had at hand for a bit and how it got there.
And if not, you might want to think very hard about which message you've failed to notice here.