Quacks of Quedlinburg Deserves Its “Board Game of the Year” Win
arstechnica.com
arstechnica.com
RNG overshadows the strategy of ingredients you buy. I can't tell if the ingredients I bought worked well together or I just got lucky. Some ingredients are strictly overpowered and others are strictly worse. The blue birds in set 1 that allow you to look at 1/2/4 tiles from your bag and choose to play 1 is incredible and you should _always_ buy it.
The catch up mechanic is interesting but favors experienced players. First, if you go bust and create a potion with more than 7 cherry bombs you must pick between getting money to buy ingredients or getting points (instead of both). At the beginning of each round players with fewer points than the lead player will get a boost to their potion. Experienced players will bust during the first 1-3 rounds in order to get more money to buy ingredients, and get a boost to their potion the next round because of the catch up mechanic.
It's a fun game and it has been getting a lot of play time because it is fast, but I'm not sure how much longer that will last.
One recommendation if you do play is to download the companion app. The game in essence requires a third-party player to validate potions with hidden solutions for the other palyers. The app takes care of role so everyone involved can be playing the game.
The article's description of Quacks had me going back to check the headline to make sure the author's position is that it's very good—looks like your experience squares with how I was reading it.