This is true, but is the data upon which the statistics "proving" no causative relationship at all between vaccines and autism completely comprehensive and absolutely correct? I wonder how many people who consider themselves educated on the matter of vaccines have bothered to actually do any significant reading on the subject.
> Hence, a doctor dismissing those claims is reasonable and expected.
Reasonable and expected sure, but objectively correct is another thing.
Similarly, asserting that vaccines do cause autism is a very different thing than simply asking for evidence that they do not, ever, and wanting to know specific details on the source/methodology behind the evidence.
Related, hat tip to lp2019 in the thread for part 1 of this essay: https://taibbi.substack.com/p/introduction-the-fairway