Hacker News Reader

Comment by baybal2 | Hacker News Reader

I'm well aware that. I'm saying that in a sense that they don't buy or use much of the original "ocp platform" they show off at their events.

And much of it was said to have ended after limited deployment in their Prineville DC, after which they switched back to regular OEM quanta gear with just few things like blue-green handlebars added, and "barebone" motherboard trays.

I've been whispered that the biggest buyers of the original "ocp platform" gear is not even facebook these days, but some banks

View on HN

Facebook's entire blob storage and data warehouse (multi-exabyte) is run completely on OCP storage hardware built by ODMs, of which Quanta is included. Anyone telling you that we don't use OCP is grossly misinformed.

Source: I was on the blob storage team when we migrated all of our data from OCP's gen1 storage design [1] to the new gen2 storage design [2].

1: https://www.opencompute.org/documents/facebook-open-vault-st...

2: https://www.opencompute.org/documents/facebook-bryce-canyon-...

edit: corrected links.

Well, then it is.

What do you use for regular servers these day?

More OCP hardware (or designs that will eventually be contributed to OCP), in many different SKUs depending on use case. This page lists most of the current-gen hardware that I am aware of:

https://www.opencompute.org/contributions?refinementList%5Bc...

So your theory is, what, that Facebook spends tons of money designing multiple generations of hardware that they don't use? Why would that make any sense?

It doesn't and that is what baffles me

So.... maybe it's worth considering that your initial premise is faulty?

Well, in that case I just got disinformated. My buddy worked in their DC, and that was his first hand account: "OCP stuff came with major deficiencies, haphazardly reverting everything back to off the shelf U1s"

I think you need better sources

So, do they?? Can you tell if that's the case?

Reply on news.ycombinator.com