Sviatoslav Richter: A Pianist Who Made the Earth Move (2015)
npr.org
npr.org
Just listen to the way the first bars, containing the unforgettable opening theme, are usually played by most of the best pianists:
- Brendel: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=TKy0Lyl4g-s
- Uchida: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=l7cc2FD06FM
- Kovacevich: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=MAZ8PA5_gVA
And now listen to Richter's version:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ZbJtHzaFpBQ
This very slow tempo is extremely difficult from the point of view of the pianist, because it requires great control of dynamics and precision. However, it allows the listener to understand all the intricacies of the harmony and of the texture. I do not usually listen Richter's version because it requires deep concentration, but I can say I never really understood this piece until I heard Richter.
Happy birthday, Maestro!
Thank you for sharing :)
How would it sound if other artists also played at a slower tempo? Can they even play at a lower tempo or that's Richter's specialty? Are there any other aspects of Richter's version besides the tempo I should be observing? I am not trying to play a devil's advocate, I am extremely curious as why I can't appreciate it as much as others.
To understand this, consider bars 185ff in the development section. Here, after a long passage where another theme dominated the scene, the main theme returns two times: first in d minor, then in B-flat major. How do the pianists play this passage?
- Kovacevich (https://youtu.be/MAZ8PA5_gVA?t=744) play the d-minor and the B-flat phrases quite in the same way.
- Brendel (https://youtu.be/TKy0Lyl4g-s?t=443) and Richter (https://youtu.be/ZbJtHzaFpBQ?t=983) play the second one much softer than the first, as if the B-flat phrase were a distant echo, or a timid answer, of the d-minor one.
- Uchida (https://youtu.be/l7cc2FD06FM?t=812) plays both occurrences very softly as if the composer wanted to remind the listener of the long-forgotten theme.
What I am trying to show here is that, apart from speed, there are many other subtle ways a pianist expresses what the composer meant. This kind of nuances can be very hard to spot, but adopting Richter's tempo makes easier to appreciate them.
Here's an example of Zimerman absolutely nailing a Chopin grande polonaise. Large hands are always helpful.
Regardless of the size of the keyboard, bigger hands will always cover more keys.
This Ravel piece https://youtu.be/PuFwt66Vr6U
His Rachmaninov pieces are absolutely divine.
And Debussy https://youtu.be/SoqSqW0YW7A
[1] https://www.amazon.com/Sviatoslav-Richter-Conversations-Brun...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=12&v=gONhZu5ad4s
I have a pet theory that it's more about flow and some kind of vision-muscle memory.
It is easy to imagine forgetting which high or low disconnected note you're supposed to start a passage from on a piece you haven't played recently -- or you have the sense of the feeling of a note but might be off by a fourth.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VoMsV5VrpFA
(This comment isn't related to Richter, I'm just sharing a nice Schubert piece for anyone interested.)
[1] I love Schubert, best composer ever in my opinion. Unfortunately, Richter couldn't Play "Tod und das Mädchen" (death and the maiden)