The reason the one has value and the other doesn't is pretty much down to brand recognition/network effect.
Though as I also said - in a central bank situation where a single chain is mandated, that's less of a concern.
The reason the one has value and the other doesn't is pretty much down to brand recognition/network effect.
Though as I also said - in a central bank situation where a single chain is mandated, that's less of a concern.
Infinite blockchains argument is not valid. Blockchains need to be secure and you can't get billions worth of mining power or POS investments from thin air. Certain blockchains have value because of this security and also from network effects. Both of these effects favor existing blockchains, not new ones. Strongest get stronger.
Which is purely down to branding.
>Infinite blockchains argument is not valid.
Because you say so?
> Blockchains need to be secure and you can't get billions worth of mining power or POS investments from thin air.
These follow value, they don't create it.