It doesn’t eliminate homelessness entirely, a lack of affordable housing in cities is a problem here just like anywhere else, but it makes it much less likely.
I know the narrative from some, especially in the US is a “why would anyone work when the state will pay for you”, but the standard of living you get in welfare is just basic survival and most if not all desire more than just that.
And there is of course mental health, a much lower rate of opioid prescriptions and therefore addictions, etc.
Rates of homelessness: Germany - 0.50% USA - 0.17%
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_homeless_...
California (and especially the Bay Area) get a lot of criticism for their homelessness not because SF is especially cruel to the homelessness, but because in the Bay Area it’s not generally considered acceptable to sweep the homeless out of town.
For instance, New York City (at least in Manhattan) was aggressive for many decades about rounding up the homeless and forcing them out of town.
This doesn’t mean the Bay Area is doing a good job with homelessness, the root of US urban homelessness does genuinely seem to be a combination of missing middle housing and a shortage of affordable and accessible mental/physical health care.
But the mere presence of visible homelessness is more about (direct) police tolerance, and (indirect) municipal political tolerance for visible homelessness.
Their estimate for 2016 is 860,000 homeless people (including approximately 440,000 homeless refugees). The number of unsheltered homeless people was estimated to be 52,000. [1]
[1] https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=auto&tl=en&u...
The rising prices for rent in cities are maybe also an factor. Besides that most homeless have some psychatric issues like addiction or psychic-problems (not everyone of cource but it's a factor) and while there is treatment available it's often not accepted and not always successfull.
I'd be curious to know for sure. It certainly sounds like the suffering and shame would be reduced, and for someone truly down on their luck it would make it easier to get back into working and life in general if you have an address to point to. Also, it reduces those sanitary problems.
I also wonder for how long the average person is homeless in Germany.
Mental health is THE key issue of the homeless population in Germany. I know some social workers who work with the homeless at the train station in my home town. Its frustrating to see how often these people are ignored with an attitude of "... ahh gee, its sad but what can you do?". There is a basic social security safety net, but if you are unable to even fill out a basic form -- let alone be prepared to fill it out in the first place, because THEY are our to poison you[1], no help that is given to you can help you.
This is also the issue I have with "Basic Income". No form of "Basic Income" will help those people, because they don't need money but treatment and some semblance of dignity in their life -- no basic income can give you that.
[1]: This is not an unusual sad story. Untreated and/or undiagnosed paranoid schizophrenia is pretty common on the street.
> Untreated and/orundiagnosed paranoid schizophrenia is pretty common on the street.
There is nothing paranoid in it. Imagine being homeless while being abused and threatened probably multiple times. What guarantee one have that the food pieces given by passerby or anyone generally are good to eat?
California, meanwhile, has recently hit an all-time low in home construction and the 2018 "boom" in housing starts was lower per-capita than any pre-1980 housing "bust".
If you want to see massive homeless populations in Europe, go to Brussels.
Most of the homeless in these areas just don't make use of these programs because of drug addictions and/or mental illness. It's a sad state, but it's not what you describe.
Taxes are used to pay for things like housing assistance, welfare, health care, and so forth. Also, "minimum wages" are higher.