There has been extensive research on vaccines in the major scientific literature, and the research has overwhelmingly reached the conclusion that there is no link with autism.
Your argument is a logical fallacy:
Moreover, are you seriously asserting the argument of "because one doctor says something, it has to be right"? I'm sorry, but the scientific process trusts the research, simple as that, and I largely trust the scientific process. The argument isn't "I think vaccines are safe because most of the world says so", my argument is "in the overwhelming amount of research that has been done on this, it has determined no link between vaccines and autism".
There is not a single scientific source anywhere that says vaccines have zero side effects and/or zero negative effects on _everyone_. (it's common knowledge that immune compromised people can't even take vaccines)
You should probably look into said "research" and see who actually funded it. Finding research that was not directly funded by a pharmaceutical is quite rare.
Here is a discussion about the data set from a pediatric hospital in America. The concerned Doctor Paul Thomas is not even against vaccines.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bjvjf4MnFqc
In reply to tombert
If you want to go over more than 1000 studies about vaccines published in established scientific journal get a copy of Neil Z Miller's book https://www.amazon.com/Vaccine-Safety-Concerned-Families-Pra...
For those who want a summary go through this video with references to studies https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CoT10nxZrVo
If you link me to a paper in a peer-reviewed journal, I'd be happy to read it.