I won't accuse of you of trying to mislead people, but the judge apologized for making the treason claim against Flynn:
https://lawandcrime.com/awkward/judge-quickly-backtracks-apo...
I won't accuse of you of trying to mislead people, but the judge apologized for making the treason claim against Flynn:
https://lawandcrime.com/awkward/judge-quickly-backtracks-apo...
Nevertheless, we now know that Flynn was acting as a propaganda agent of Turkey - by his own testimony, used to convict his co-conspirators - without registering as such. Do you consider this a "process crime"?
Yes, but that was lying in denying collusion in both the case of Pappadopolous (as a Trump campaign official and with support of higher ups, with Russia) and Stone (as a go-between for the Trump campaign, with WikiLeaks—described by the Trump campaign as a “hostile non-state intelligence service”—where WikiLeaks was, based on information in other indictments, either cooperating with or duped by a Russian intelligence operation.)
"Collusion" isn't an actual crime, so of course nobody was convicted for it. But convicting people for illegal activity proximate to the collusion is exactly what happened. Al Capone was convicted for tax fraud, not being a gangster, because that was what they could prove in court.