Vitamin D, Calcium Supplements May Be Unnecessary
businessweek.com
businessweek.com
"The body also makes vitamin D from the sun, although in the winter in the northern half of the U.S., the sun is not strong enough for vitamin D production. While their diet may not supply enough vitamin D for many people, the sun provides enough to make up the difference, the report said."
Apparently, in the winter people should take vitamin D supplements.
However, I can't see how that's possible. For at least two months of the year, I basically only see the sun on weekends, and it's usually cloudy. (Plus, I don't eat the vitamin D fortified foods they mention, but that's probably not true for most people here).
Given that D has a lot more functions than that, it's ... limited in utility at best. I have heard that D testing is a bit messy, though.
For a counterpart observation, if you're white, at a low enough latitude and get (nearly) whole body sun exposure for 30 minutes during the summer, your body generates a self-regulated amount of D of 10,000 IU (or maybe a bit more, I forget exactly how much). Regulated in that staying out longer won't increase the amount you get per day.
That suggests various obvious things, especially about safe maximum levels of D in your body.
One final comment: as far as I can tell, with the exception of Vitamin C to a certain extent, you simply cannot study one or two required nutrients in isolation. E.g. if you have too little of X, Y or Z you may not absorb enough D in your body. Ditto for too much of M, N or P. Then there's questions of "how much fiber in the meal?", is there enough fat for the fat soluble stuff, etc. etc.
And our general knowledge of digestion and what goes on in the digestive tract it pathetic. Did you know that you've got more bacteria in your gut than you have cells in your body?