Hacker News Reader

Comment by gnur | Hacker News Reader

As far as I am aware, Google hasn't shut anything down that you actually pay for. So fear mongering about GCP is just begin irrational.

View on HN

The whole Nexus brand springs to mind. The best mid-tier phone available was killed and replaced with nearly the exact same specs at the highest price possible.

Sent begrudgingly from a Pixel.

The exact reason why I transitioned from a Nexus to an Android One. The Pixel price-point is too damn high.

The Nexus line did exactly what it was supposed to do. It was meant to push an idealistic vision of what Android phones were supposed to be onto the market at a (too) competitive price point to force other Android manufacturers to follow suit.

A few years down the line, consumers have flocked to Android in large numbers, so now it's time to appease other phone manufacturers and guard the bottom line by discontinuing the Nexus line which ran at a loss.

Wasn't that the same idea with Microsoft's Surface device line-up? Windows hardware used to be hot garbage when compared to Apple hardware, but manufacturers have since stepped up their game. But instead of killing the Surface line, Microsoft have doubled down on it.

Hopefully they triple-down and release a SP with USB-C.

I'm very salty about that. I really wish they'd just release a range of perhaps 2 phones, one solid mid-range and one top-spec, that get guarenteed fast updates to Android.

I used to have a Nexus 5, and getting the latest android soon after release was a big feature. I've got a Moto Z2 Play now and there is still no sign of updating to the latest.

The Nexus 6p was around the same price as the iPhone when it came out, think it was $500 vs $550.

Maybe not shutdown, but the Maps API 10x price increase has definitely made me gun shy about using GCP.

Right, they just let it wither. If you have a google apps domain, you run months to years behind getting new features compared to their free offerings.

Then there's Google glass...when was the last update for that?

Paid has not meant any kind 9f safety net from Google's mercurial attitudes.

I have a personal google apps domain and don’t mind this.

Being on a slow, stable update release track means I have the better version of the product IMO. I don’t need the latest flashy updates pushed immediately to my gmail as long as the battle-tested version gets there eventually.

Also, it’s ultimately an enterprise product and rapid changes aren’t appropriate for that space anyway.

But they also refuse to consider charging for popular products that users would be happy to pay for, like Reader and Inbox. So there's more in play here than narrow bean-counting.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com