News outlet Markup ousts editor-in-chief Julia Angwin, prompting resignations
cjr.org
cjr.org
Craig Newmark, who makes up $20M of the ~$23M in initial funding, has only said "I can’t ethically comment right now."
https://twitter.com/juliacarriew/status/1120742407371235328
[0] https://www.pulitzer.org/finalists/julia-angwin-jeff-larson-...
> "She has removed any reference to investigative journalism from our Editorial Value Proposition. She has urged me to run articles with headlines such as ‘Facebook is a dumpster fire.’"
This is pretty damming, the most important thing to a news organization is it's credibility. Going to their website it looks like they haven't launched yet, this may cause them to be DOA.
https://themarkup.org/donations-faq.html#negative-tech-stori...
> Most of our stories will expose problems; that’s just the nature of investigative journalism. (As George Orwell reputedly once said, “journalism is printing what someone else does not want printed; everything else is public relations.”) But that doesn’t mean we’re anti-technology; we have the same love/hate relationship with technology that everybody does.
That said, this is a pretty specific claim:
> According to Angwin, Gardner, the former head of the Wikimedia Foundation, created a spreadsheet ranking candidates for reporter positions according to their views toward technology companies.