> but for surfing, some hobby programming and as a travel OS OpenBSD definitely won me over.
Mac OS X has won me (and many others) over when it comes to these topics. I'm curious why BSD would be your choice. It sounds painful?
Mac OS X has won me (and many others) over when it comes to these topics. I'm curious why BSD would be your choice. It sounds painful?
The base packages get upgraded on a timescale approaching lolnever. They should be ashamed of themselves for shipping machines with Bash 3 still and that's just the tip of the iceberg.
OpenBSD is so simple for me and it takes me a fraction of the time to configure a new OpenBSD system than a new Mac.
For programming, yes, although I don't know if brew would be called "herculean". For battery life and ease of use, no.
I've setup BSD on linux on personally modded thinkpads (putting in faster cpus, new wifi cards, etc), and you have got to be joking when you say it's simpler or faster than turning on a new mac and installing brew. It's infinitely more customizable for sure, but it's not simpler or easier. Especially when it comes to tuning battery life.
And for highly used programs like adobe photoshop, illustrator/affinity design, premiere, etc, forget it. Even Sketch isn't available on linux.
And this doesn't account for physical clunkiness either. My t430 was so bulky. The x220 was nice but the display wasn't that good, nor the cpu.
Yes No multimedia programs, cause I am a mathematician and for pdf I use pdftools; so no Adobe also; started with Slackware in 2007 after an abysmal windows period from 1991 till 2007; now I use openbsd and emacs simply rocks and is rock solid on openbsd.
I also think they're vastly underestimating the amount of stuff that needs to be configured on a new mac host.
My office workstation (Arch Linux) and home desktops/servers (all OpenBSD) can be installed and configured repeatably in ~5 minutes flat.
I literally have an ansible playbook that pulls in my dotfiles and installs a list of the packages that I want. That's a hundred times simpler than setting up my work laptop (Mac) for development, where not only do I have to install xcode dev tools and homebrew and the packages that I want, but most of the packages that I install need additional configuration applied to work correctly.
How is your R setup in OpenBSD? Like what software do you use in tandem when coding R?
This is not an apples-to-apples comparison. You're comparing highly modified laptops with questionably supported mods to a stock Mac. Of course the highly modified laptop isn't going to install BSD smoothly. It's unlikely to install anything smoothly, at least compared to a Mac where the hardware configuration is locked down.
The only thing that makes macos at all usable for me is Nix.
That is not what matters to developers invested into Apple's ecosystem.
I've tried using Amethyst or whatever the tiling window manager is, but I found it crashed a lot and the keybindings weren't great.
Overall I think MacOS is a great OS, I just feel like I need a real tiling manager that I can't get without Linux.
The first thing I do when setting up a new Mac is swap the option and command keys.
Using Mac OS X or Windows will give me a headache. I just don't like their user interface. And I've used both of them a lot; I had my G4 iMac with 10.0.0 back in the days, and kind of liked 10.3.0 until Linux won me over again.
And why I said the thing about Apple originally is that it seems to be almost a meme that every single thread about Linux or *BSD gets a discussion about Apple products. It's so weird :)