Maybe I misread, but none of the articles linked above suggest any malicious intent. Could you clarify what specifically you're referring to?
They can make money from contact lists, but IIUC the article said they didn't use the contact lists. Also, given that it only affected a couple million users (like 0.1% of their user base), the damage to their reputation would far outweigh any benefits of actually using those contact lists.
On the last item, the collection of email passwords, the only benefit would be if they actually use those passwords to get information, so the above point covers it.
Let me know if I'm missing something.
It's a bit like Exxon Valdez: they don't profit from spilling oil in the ocean, but they should still be penalized for cutting corners on safety.