If you keep doing ideological flamewars on HN we will ban you. Also, if you keep doing personal attacks on HN we will ban you.
Please review https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html and follow the rules when posting here from now on.
Please review https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html and follow the rules when posting here from now on.
You’re simply using etiquette as a guise for people who don’t want to have an honest discussion about the relevant philosophy (or in this case, the actual logic involved in the inference) to shut it down in favor of group think.
This problem is so widespread among the tech community, Congress is talking about it.
Just look at how fast this was downvoted and flagged — the point is to silence wrongthink.
Censorship for etiquette has always been used as a tool of political coercion — and I simply don’t take your vague claims I broke decorum, which always target one side of a sensitive issue, seriously.
You can absolutely use your power in your fiefdom; but you can’t use it to make me not talk honestly about issues — only remove me.
You’re just a political thug, who doesn’t like honest, blunt language.
Show me.
Ed:
There’s hundreds of comments like this without a peep, because they’re rightthink:
Let me put it this way: I wonder how to convince you how little we give a shit about decorum. What a miserable life it would be to spend one's days enforcing something that...limited. Such a concept appears nowhere in the site guidelines or in its moderation history.
It's pretty striking to hear "You’re just a political thug", and I can certainly understand why your comments have so much force in them if you feel that way. When you say we "always target one side of a sensitive issue", though, that's so factually inaccurate that I'm not sure what else I can do that would help.