In England, rhubarb is grown by candlelight
bbc.com
bbc.com
A particularly choice quote:
"From 1750 to 1850 Russia was making a fortune from trading rhubarb root through St Petersburg to Europe via the Baltic. Russia supplied and controlled the export of the dried root, thus controlling its price. It banned the export of the seeds to block the growing of the plant elsewhere. Catherine the Great took considerable interest in the cultivation and sale of rhubarb, as it helped to finance her military campaigns in Finland, Poland, Ukraine and Crimea. The price of rhubarb root rocketed! At one time the seeds were more valuable, weight for weight, than gold. To give some idea of the veneration that was given to the plant, Lord Stanhope, a Catholic peer, sent some rhubarb seeds to the Pope in a gold case, encouraging him to grow the plant in the gardens at the Vatican. This monopoly could not last indefinitely. Professor John Hope stated in 1770 that if 'Russian' rhubarb could be grown successfully in the UK, it would save the economy about £1 million a year (approximately £20–30 million in today's money)"
There's plenty of incentives in the market to innovate in the GMO space without legal protections, as there have been for thousands of years. Absent those protections, GMO development would probably see more cooperation innovation without hurting the speed of innovation.
Regional protections for product labeling make a lot more sense (vidalia onions...) and improve competition while still benefiting large growers.
_The Thief at the end of the World_, the story of "bio-pirate" Henry Wickham, who smuggled rubber seeds out of Brazil in the 1870s, is a great read.[0]
[0]-https://www.amazon.com/Thief-End-World-Rubber-Empire/dp/0670...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bad_Samaritans:_The_Myth_of_Fr...
"Free Trade" and strong "intellectual property" regimes are tools of economically dominant, not upstart, countries.
Related:
Chamber's Encyclopaedia, Editorial Statement, Revised Edition, 1874: Or a 19th Century Edit War
https://old.reddit.com/r/dredmorbius/comments/4xe2k1/chamber...
("Free trade" plays a role.)
Making the (I'm guessing safe) assumption that the UK Rhubarb industry is worth more than that. I wonder if this is an indication of just how much the economy has grown that that now seems like such a small sum (the £20-£30 million figure). Or if it's an example of the value of something increasing despite it becoming 'free'. Rhubarb is effectively now in the public domain, and it seems crazy (to me at least) that someone would try to maintain a monopoly on the plant. Although half way through writing this I remembered Monsanto...
A billion pound savings isn't anything to sneeze at in a niche luxury good.
On top of that, the nature of the thing we are measuring has changed. Today it's a fruit, 250 years ago it's seeds and root were medicinal.
All that said I'm struggling to work out where you got the billion £ figure from, or the 40x increase. The first 2 tables seem to suggest growth on the order of 100-150 fold, which would suggest £100 millions, rather than a billion, or am I misunderstanding something?
I've been playing with contact microphones the past year and recently made a balanced one myself that eliminates a lot of the noise such types of high impedance microphones pick up. The sounds you can hear in nature are amazing, just that you usually have to get away from it all just to be able to hear nature at play. But with contact microphones, you can open up a whole new level of sounds, think of them as microscopes for audio. But a simple piezo contact microphone is easy to make and if you have the equipment to take a balanced input signal, then for the extra cost of the extra piezo disc and 3 wire cable, that can be done just as cheaply. You will also need a pre-amp and though most things you can plug a microphone into will have some preamp that will get you started. Myself, I use a Zoom H4N pro portable audio recorder. Can get cheaper options, even projects that people have made their own form of portable recorder. But if you just want to listen, a simple preamp (can make one or buy one cheap enough) and some over-ear headphones, will get you into another world of sounds in everyday life that we miss out upon. Like I said earlier - it is like an audio microscope and opens up so much we miss out upon.
One thing you will learn, most nature programs you see upon TV, mess about/fake and play with the real sounds actually made in nature with a bias towards faking it and a penchant of layering so many effects that it makes autotune look like an angel in the music world for any purist. Bit like finding out about the actual status of Santa after years of childhood idolisation :).
But so many sounds we miss out upon. Equally we are very limited in our senses, Ultraviolet photography in nature shows us this. Sounds are just the same with our limited hearing, but that doesn't stop us. Bat listening devices exist and open up a another way of exploring the World around us.
If your into geeking out, you could use an array of contact microphones, sound identification and with placement, work out the timing and with triangulation - track all the earthworms. That would be a fun project, but probably low-down on many a project list.
I listen to music a lot, but sometimes it's worth it to take my headphones off and listen - really listen to the world around me. It's strangely calming.
(Or was it earthworms? It was just my hypothesis)
Growing up, rhubarb was neither sweet nor interesting. I'm now quite intrigued.
I've been growing rhubarb for several years now. It comes back by itself every spring, and can be frozen for off-season use. The rabbits and gophers won't eat it, because the leaves are rather toxic to us animals (the stalks are perfectly edible, either cooked or raw). All I have to do is make sure my plants get adequate water.
This spring I bought three more bare rhubarb roots when they first appeared at the garden store. Last spring I bought bare root rhubarb late in the spring, when they were half-off, but they never grew.
The instructions say to not harvest any stalks the first year, so the plant can put energy into its root. When I bought my first plant it was already a year or two old. The garden center guy said to cut the bottom out of the pot it came in and put that over the plant, so the stalks would have to 'stretch' to reach sunlight.
Here's a random page about forcing, as this bbc article mentions: http://rhubarbinfo.com/forcing
My blog post about Rhubarb as a 'functional food': https://radialappliance.teslabox.com/2017/06/pie-plant-rhuba...
I think Rhubarb roots can be split when they get big enough, sort of like bulbs, but I haven't gotten to that point yet.
But it contains a lot of calcium oxalate and potassium oxalate so watch for kidney stones.
Who do you think you're arguing against? This is a whole article about how it's useful for a lot of things.
> This is a whole article about how it's useful for a lot of things.
I just re-skimmed the article. I didn't notice much/any discussion the medicinal properties of rhubarb, just how 'forcing' rhubarb makes it extra-sweet, and that rhubarb is used to flavor gin and cheese too.
I'll definitely try the rhubarb soon with it.
http://cooking-books.blogspot.com/2011/05/chicken-with-baked...
3 ingredients.
Pistols at dawn.
What? How? Its one of the easiest things to harvest ?!