It's worse even than that. We have to choose to stop doing things we are already doing, on a massive scale, from which we derive enormous benefits. That's really tough, it's like getting a junkie off the hard stuff in the middle of a really bad bender. Except the benefits we get from abusing oil and coal and plastics aren't illusory, they provide livelihoods to huge swathes of the world's population.
This is where Thunberg's analysis comes short. The benefits from abusing resources don't just go to a tiny few. They go to all of us. We travel around in fossil fueled vehicles, the food and goods we consume travel and are farmed the same way, we fly on holiday in fossil fueled jets, we use cheap electricity from non-renewable sources. Rapidly switching away from these will carry enormous costs, just look at the energy market in Germany that's essentially being bailed out by French Nuclear power, and really wasn't even possible decades ago.
If it really was just a small minority getting all the benefits, fixing this would be politically easy. We do need to act yes, it's a real problem with dire consequences, but it's not a simple issue.