> Child pornography under federal law is defined as any visual depiction of sexually explicit conduct involving a minor (someone under 18 years of age). Visual depictions include photographs, videos, digital or computer generated images indistinguishable from an actual minor, and images created, adapted, or modified, but appear to depict an identifiable, actual minor.
But that's not so in Japan. So one ought take care when torrenting Japanese films in the US.
0) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Child_pornography_laws_in_the_...
Obscenity itself requires an average expectation of what obscenity is, otherwise the exception dissipates entirely.
It is therefore easy for me to see that the technological availability of this would change it. there would be attempts by executive branch and legislature that are obliged to simply say something “should” be illegal, and a court wouldnt be able to agree with that on constitutional grounds
I think Denmark briefly allowed “all” pornography. Zoo was legal there until a few years ago, even had commercial production.