Cultural Tattoos Invisible in Wet Collodion Prints (2018)
fstoppers.com
fstoppers.com
I must say the effect is strange, it does make the people look darker and more 'foreign' (from a Europeans perspective)
I wonder what effect photos like this had on perpetuating colonialism by making the natives appear less like themselves (the colonists).
I think the effect is a bit like what infrared photography does to freckles: https://petapixel.com/2015/09/28/this-is-what-infrared-photo...
by the late 20th century, 'ortho' meant a monochromatic film or printing paper that was not sensitive to red light, hence it could be handled in a darkroom with a red safe-lite. however, the spectral sensitivity of even standard photo paper today might be greater than the earliest emulsions.
The extended green sensitivity is what made it right. Or at least somewhat less wrong than things had been. If they'd found a way to create panchromatic plates/film before ortho as we know it happened, the name "orthochromatic" would have been given to that instead.
So why did ortho rule the roost in the darkroom and in process photography when we had "actinic" papers around? (Obviously, panchromatic is out unless you like working in total darkness.) Incandescent lamps for exposure is a big part of the answer. You don't get a lot of blue light out of a glowing filament, and sunlight isn't quite as consistent and reliable as you might want it to be. (And arc lights aren't a lot of fun to work with or around.) Non-repro blue, a pale cyan that humans can easily distinguish but ortho film/paper can't, is most of the rest. Panchromatic can "see" non-repro blue by design, and "actinic" can see it because it's not blue enough to appear white if it's dark enough to see easily (in paste-up, etc.). Non-repro blue, ruby masks and relatively bright safelight made life... well, not exactly easy when compared to, say, a desktop publishing application, but it beat the heck out of constant squinting in the dark, wondering if that thing was really supposed to be there, or if it was a line at all.
Using only the blue channel from a color image is an easy shortcut to obtaining the look which is sometimes done to depict someone as rugged, aged, and weathered for artistic effect.
Here's an article on simulating this look digitally, from the same publication.
https://petapixel.com/2019/04/05/recreating-the-look-of-1850...
As an aside, I've just started doing them myself and it's clear why there's been a resurgence. Scans don't really do them justice, and the aforementioned sensitivity makes freckles/other features really stand out. It's also really hard, and takes a good 5-10 minutes per shot.
The photographic process used is only sensitive to blue/near-UV light. People with dark skin absorb lots of blue/near-UV light. This is why their skin looks darker under this process than it actually is. The tattoos also absorb blue/near-UV light, but the (apparently extra-dark) skin masks the difference, as the contrast ratio between skin covered/not covered with a tattoo is lowered.
Could we use these as templates to recover tattoos in photos from the time-period the article mentions?
> Tā moko is different from ordinary tattooing because chisels (called uhi are used to carve the skin and opposed to using needles and puncturing. As a result, the skin is grooved rather than smooth in the tattoo areas.
Super clear photo of the old result: https://scontent-yyz1-1.cdninstagram.com/vp/b80fdf49074ae5b4...
(it appears to have been maybe sharpened in software?)
edit to add:
I think chisels are no longer used because 1] it's painful 2] not many people know how to do that anymore -- but they sure do look good, the old way. They used to use a bluer ink, made of caterpillar guts among other things? A painter named Charles Goldie did some great portraits showing that older pigment:
https://i.pinimg.com/736x/c5/52/82/c55282ddab815e9e4d9d7f2d8...
https://www.nzgeo.com/wp-content/uploads/1998/04/38_Goldie_1...
https://s3.amazonaws.com/img.aasd.com.au/86317163.jpg
https://images.internationalartcentre.co.nz/_auctions/2018/2...
and many many more
And some trivia, moko were occasionally used as signatures on old deeds and treaties, since moko identified the bearer and no two were the same: https://c8.alamy.com/comp/PM1Y2X/image-from-page-41-of-moko-...