> So, it is at best foolish to insist that C can ever be faster than C. The falsehood is trivially exposed.
Enough with the faulty logic, where are the benchmarks proving it? I've still provided more evidence of your assertion than you have.
Enough with the faulty logic, where are the benchmarks proving it? I've still provided more evidence of your assertion than you have.
From there, maybe you could use C++ features to improve the speed (and then C++ is faster) or you could not (and then they have the same speed).