It is up to you, or the reader, to choose to believe him or not and the information he provided is already more than he is obligated to give to enrich your life with. It is, as you put it, a “good place to start” if you wish to google more yourself.
It is up to you, or the reader, to choose to believe him or not and the information he provided is already more than he is obligated to give to enrich your life with. It is, as you put it, a “good place to start” if you wish to google more yourself.
Perhaps those with no legal training should be the ones Googling, since many here clearly have no idea what they're talking about.
Think of any comment by anyone here as someone graciously providing you with free counsel out of the time of their day, with the big disclaimer that they are not your client, and that the information is under no warranty. This disclaimer is implicit on all internet comments. It is up to you to consider their claims, and verify them. If you’re not willing to research their claims yourself then it’s pretty clear that
1) you’re just here to argue for one side to the public (aka propaganda)
2) pursuit of the truth is not actually your goal
Given that your profile states that you are both part of the military and also a government lawyer may indicate that both 1) and 2) are true.
I think you’ll be hard pressed to convince people they are wrong simply by accusing them that they are wrong due to lack of evidence. There is no court here, no jury to decide you win or lose. You can contribute more to this discussion by offering your unique perspective given your background.
https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/msa/rimg/article-abstract/6...