I appreciate the work, and thought so far, I was just super stoked for like “MOAR infos,” and then didn’t really get any so I’m a bit disappointed ;_; or maybe I’m just missing something like usual?
I appreciate the work, and thought so far, I was just super stoked for like “MOAR infos,” and then didn’t really get any so I’m a bit disappointed ;_; or maybe I’m just missing something like usual?
Maybe I'm over-stating the value, but it's good to remember that, as software and automation becomes more ubiquitous, good standards and good engineering are going to get more and more important.
What's the difference? Developers can only leverage existing technology if they are aware they exist, and unfortunately specs such as the "home document for HTTP APIs" draft aren't publicized that often, so developers tend to waste time reinventing the wheel.
> Additionally, this would be more useful it contained (I didn’t see any from my phone) links to example implementations or discussions about the RFC.
Typically specs already include examples. For example, picking up again the "home document for HTTP APIs" draft, section 2 starts off with a clear example of such a document.