Hacker News Reader

You mention this ad hominem so you can extrapolate beliefs that may be completely fabricated.

Why do you try to read my mind? It violates the laws of physics and I explicitly wrote why I mentioned his political views. I don't think he has the views I extrapolated, which is why I wonder why he has the ones he says he has.

I did not read your mind. I summarized your actions. I never assumed intent or motivation. You are the one who did those things. Projection.

Perhaps that assumption you made that you apparently don't believe was a completely made up figment of your imagination, which is what my comment illustrates.

What you're writing doesn't make any sense, sorry.

Libertarians don't generally attribute poor people's situation to laziness. Conscientiousness would be a closer approximation, but still pretty bad.

Can you please explain what they do attribute it to (or link an explanation)? The very reason I mentioned Barkley's views is that they made me realize that I don't understand Libertarians.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com