No. If the system had been different, the candidates would have adopted a different strategy and you can't predict the outcome. The current system doesn't incentivize republicans from California to go vote like it doesn't for democrats from Alabama.

>I want New York City and Los Angeles to select the president of the United States for the far foreseeable future.

No thanks though. You can argue first past the post, or ranked, or even if the division of EC votes always makes sense. But these are the rules we have - for good reason.

Hillary Clinton didn't get 3 million more votes, she got 74 fewer.