> Or are you trying to reveal some sort of hidden value judgment or bias or something related to the politics of global warming?

Mainly that, although you aren't the person I posed the question to, and it may not apply to you. Assuming you're being sincere, it doesn't appear to.

Since we've come this far, if I may continue asking you:

Since you seem to sincerely believe that AGW theory is soundly supported by basic science, what do you make of the many reputable, accomplished scientists, physicists, etc. who do not believe that it is soundly supported by basic science?

What do you make of the former IPCC scientists who have whistleblown on the IPCC scientists' political bias and resigned in protest?

What do you make of Cook, et al's fraudulent "97% consensus" paper?

I appreciate your thoughtful discussion.