Lots of executives. Lots of advisors. High powered board. No demo. First prototype due this month.
Uh oh.
The Lincoln Labs group didn't get very far. They could image a single mannequin at close range in a controlled environment. Whether this will work in a cluttered environment is an open question.
It might work for sports stadiums, which heavily restrict what you can bring in.
Even if they deploy an ineffective version in 12 months, in 240 months they might have effective hardware. This is the direction some people want things to go.
Provided they can still borrow money to fund operations.
Does it? If anyone has data on this, I'd be very interested.
I've recently been giving some thought to pervasive electronic and video surveillance as an alternative (specifically not as a supplement) to the presence of armed police being deployed by default in public.
> Lots of executives. Lots of advisors. High powered board. No demo. First prototype due this month.
> Uh oh.
It's like reading Bad Blood in real time.
[1] https://techcrunch.com/2015/04/26/kill-the-cord/
[2] https://techcrunch.com/2018/09/20/ubeam/
[3] https://liesandstartuppr.blogspot.com/2019/01/more-ubeam-at-...