And if they did, what’s wrong with it? People are not allowed to make money? As long as they don’t prioritize based on affiliation I don’t see a problem.
what’s wrong with it?
A belief that, when the subject of the report is handing over cash and free samples to the reporter, "unbiased" reporting won't actually be unbiased.You see this in loads of situations, even those with ethics codes and suchlike. From Youtubers and Instagram influencers all the way to professional games journalists and national newspapers' lifestyle magazines.
people here seem to have a hard on for wirecutter
Not me, I've seen https://www.xdesk.com/wirecutter-standing-desk-review-pay-to... † - precisely the sort of observations that make people suspicious of shill reviewers.† which admittedly wirecutter disagree with https://thewirecutter.com/our-response-to-nextdesk/