Downvoters: if you think names for products do not matter you are mistaken.
Downvoters: if you think names for products do not matter you are mistaken.
They've been around for several years and have had millions of dollars in funding. If you're going to argue that their name is holding them back from mainstream acceptance, first you should establish that they don't already have that.
Disagreeing with your particular opinions on a particular name doesn't imply a belief that names don't matter.
What would you have picked, master namer? What criteria determines what the mainstream will accept? "Mongo" seems like a bit of a funny name to me, but they seem to be doing alright... What makes Mongo okay but Cockroach not?
Apple is a cute name. Does it pass your test?