China Prepares to Drop Microsoft Windows, Blames U.S. Hacking Threat
forbes.com
forbes.com
What would "China" dropping Microsoft windows mean? Surely not all Chinese companies stopping use, since that would be extremely disruptive. More likely a few ministries starting a program to try Linux.
Not that a scenario where possession of an install disk would be a crime doesn't appeal to me. The weight of the entire Chinese state might help the Linux desktop crack 10% usage but suspect I'll have to dream on.
It would require more UI that there currently is. Even for simple things I often find myself stuck in front of a terminal, looking at the documentation to figure out how the damn thing works before I can even look for the right syntax.
It's picking up every issue on Linux and paints it as a disaster.
Then it goes to "I have no idea what I'm talking about" mode with
> There's no concept of drivers in Linux aside from proprietary drivers for NVIDIA/AMD GPUs
Every time I tried to use Linux on desktop, I stopped due to a dozen of issues from that list.
> There's no concept of drivers in Linux
In Windows ecosystem, you buy hardware, plug it in, install drivers, and it works. On modern Windows, often they downloaded automatically by Windows, and start without reboots.
I think the OP meant that Linux can't offer comparable UX. The drivers are compiled into the kernel.
On the source level, this is due to the lack of the ABI.
At this point in time, given how technical a site HN is, and how many people have success with linux, it looks very much like the problem might be you. I don't mean this to be nasty, but installing and customising linux now is a pretty trivial exercise.
> On modern Windows, often they downloaded automatically by Windows, and start without reboots.
On modern linux, they are usually already present on the system and it just works. You don't need the download stage for the vast majority of things. Nvidia Graphics cards are an obvious exception, but for the most part, this complaint is spurious.
This includes me. I successfully develop commercial-quality stuff for Linux servers, also embedded for ARM devices (using Debian kernel so far). But the desktop is different.
> usually already present on the system
The hardware is just too diverse. I have following USB devices plugged into my desktop right now. USB 3.0 DisplayLink monitor: proprietary protocol, still experimental support on Linux, chip vendor only supports Ubuntu, monitor vendor doesn’t support any. Logitech C920 web camera: microphone, auto focus, on-board h264 codec. Logitech G700s: a mouse with 7 extra buttons and horizontal scrolling. Microsoft LifeChat LX6000: 2 way USB audio, OS volume controls, a couple extra buttons. Also wireless adapter for xbox gamepad: 6 analog axes, many buttons, two vibration motors, two way audio.
There is plenty of great Desktop Environments nowadays that can easily compete with the UX you are used to from Windows (KDE Plasma, Gnome 3, Deepin,...).
Most things just work out of the box even without installing drivers. Yes there is still some problems (e.g. Laptop WiFi / old or exotic hardware) but I stumbled upon them in Windows and OSX as well.
Every OS has issues but I prefer Linux for everything besides graphics and working on PDF because most of the times I find a solution I can implement myself without much hassle. OSX on the other side is very closed in comparison but I don't bother because Photoshop and Acrobat run just fine and I don't need much more.
Windows is just spyware, a security threat to people with free minds. I totally welcome China to switch to Linux and probably this will bring our world to a path towards more free software (very ironically because the US always tries to appear as the "Sheriff of the free world").
Would you buy a car where "most things work", if you had no mechanical skills?
I'm a hardcore Linux user, but even with that, I don't advocate it unless I know exactly the platform a given user is going to work on.
There are surely issues on any system, but in Windows/Mac there is the expectation of everything working out of the box, since there is more of a "package" ("box") culture.
In this sense, projects like the Dell XPS are certainly big steps forward (and even the XPS has at least one significant issue out of the box).
My family and friends like to come to me with their IT problems and it's easier for me to solve them if they use Linux.
The big problems with Mac/Windows can in many cases also not be solved by me, easily (e.g. Driver for XYZ doesn't work - on Windows this means searching another EXE that could work but if it doesn't you can exchange the device in question because my Latin is exhausted at that point).
Sure there is problems with every system - it just depends on what you do and how you use computers what problems are the most concerning ones I think.
My pain points, when trying to build a HTPC:
- Proper video support (like GPU offloading or vblank syncing) is haphazard at best.
- Font management is a pain. Not just the antialiasing, but adding a custom font and making sure all apps can find it.
- Audio support is a mess; pulseaudio creates as much problems as it solves (for example last I checked, it did not support IEC958 passthrough over spdif).
- Bluetooth connectivity appears to be a desktop-environment thing, so good luck logging in with your BT keyboard.
- Zeroconf service configuration is archaic (for example, advertising a Samba print share so that local machines can find it, or advertising a DLNA media source). It requires hand-editing xml configuration files.
Still, for all its flaws, it still beats other commercial offerings in terms of productivity.
Worth noting that this is far from the first time China has done this. First there was the original Kylin OS, based on FreeBSD, then they created their own Linux distro called Red Flag OS, and now they have the new Kylin project which is Ubuntu based. Interesting to see how it plays out this time around.
What irony? I thought that by this point it was clear that nations all over the world are hacking each other; it doesn't seem that far-fetched to try and protect your nation from that. Whether that should be through a new custom built OS is a different ball of wax.
No sir, they definitely didn't do that before Russia countered by doing the same.
Nope. We have always been at war with Eurasia. Move along citizen.
They broke an agreement by doing this, then condemned Russia for reacting in the same way.
It's simple hypocrisy.
I'd say it's easier, if you take into account the ludicrous number of military bases the US has all around the world, the constant involvement in one or more wars, the infinite sabre rattling with North Korea, the unconditional support for what ever the hell Israel decides to do.
I don't think US is more or less naturally inclined to be an international bully, but they have the capacity and actually do it on a scale no other country can since the USSR dissolved.
There will be a period of chaos as the old world and new world duke it out.
As more products become smart things, this will impact trade somewhat.
For the smaller countries, there's no change from the atomic era: they'll source their smart thing from their protector power. There's a lot of friction getting there though, as many of them defected and sourced from a cheaper alternative.
China is playing the exact same card that USA does. Microsoft (willingly or not) have been playing ball with the 3-letter-agencies (3LA) to keep vulnerabilities secret and to the 3LA's advantage. If USA is going to 'cry wolf' on Huawei, then it is fair game that RPC will 'cry wolf' on Microsoft (and/or Cisco, and/or Oracle, and/or pick-your-own-company).
This is not China playing the same card. This is China playing aggressively, as they have been.
It's a smart strategy, don't get me wrong, but let's not claim the US as the initiators of these market-distorting actions.
Oh, states will take sides out of interest: interest to make money, to get protection, to not become enemy via the “with me or against me ideology”. But not for any moral reason.
What do you think the invasion of Iraq was all about?
And china isn't 1st here in issuing a ban, they are retaliating here.
Either way it will be interesting to see if they succeed in making it more secure considering that they don't have technical debt to worry about.
Even with enough time, such a project requires highly skilled workers, and those are the ones that could also find good opportunities in the private sector (potentially outside China) with likely better compensation and less pressure. So I doubt they will find the best people for this job.
Computing as itself is getting more interesting than I would expect it.
All US services/closed systems present a national security threat to sovereign states.
What all of these countries should be doing is organizing these sorts of open source frameworks for developing future tech because it's obvious that it can be done that way and that individual countries are incapable of producing these goods on their own in various corrupt authoritarian sorts of governments.
We are at peace because we depend on each other.
I disagree with the way that Trump administration is handling things. Making more noise to cover the previously-made-noise is a downward spiral/slippery slope, and he's on it.
China (aka Chinese People) will not suffer, because they will just not. They won't feel the 'pain' of losing 20% of their income if that happens. People living in the USA on the other hand, they will feel a 20% drop much harder. It is a sprint for Trump administration, but a marathon for Xi's and Vlad's administration. I fear that we haven't seen the worse part yet.
[edit] Also this trade war is gold for the propaganda. While the wealthy/educated people don't buy it too much, it helps Xi and his government with the "mass", thus strenghtening his power.
Intel, as far as I know, only let people go because they've been diminished due to ARM and Cisco with smartphone processors.
What is this new CPU from China? China is quite publicly known to be years behind the US in semiconductor design & fabrication.
I would agree with your statement that we'll get a new Chinese OS. Overall this is already in existence w/ WeChat, and all they need to do is go further down into the Kernal. As Android is restricted partially in the future, this may lead to other problems thought.
We'll see.
https://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/04/10/us_intel_china_ban/
https://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/07/15/china_supercomputer...
https://www.nextplatform.com/2016/06/20/look-inside-chinas-c...
http://www.netlib.org/utk/people/JackDongarra/PAPERS/sunway-...
https://www.theregister.co.uk/2018/11/13/500_supercomputers_...
I am not saying Intel lays off people only because of the Chinese ban but I think it contributes to its troubles if they cannot sell Xeon processors to China.
Both countries, honestly, should be "fine" without the same levels of trade we've had in the past. Per capita GDP is to the point where trade can be diminished whilst maintaining relatively stable growth. The problem is primarily, IMO, to do with world tensions & world peace.
Trump did not name enough ambassadors, and everything turned out pretty well, no? That's because US ambassies work pretty well w/o any ambassador. Those are just prestigial distinctions, the workers don't really change. At least in France, there is at least 5 power: the administration is the 5th, and it should not be underestimated.
We block Huawei, they ditch MS. Intel and AMD must be looking into risk and contingencies about now too...
Simply downloading Debian from a valid mirror isn't the same.
Red Flag was made mandatory in a lot of public access points like cyber-cafes.
What the creator of that video identifies as 'spyware' was telemetry of the app store because it was built with web tech (cnzz, the chinese equivalent of google analytics). Calling it spyware given that we're talking about Chinese users is clickbait of the worst sort.