We got here by setting policies based on the bottom rather than the middle. The problem isn't that the bottom 5% needs a modest raise, it's that the middle 50% should be making enough to afford to buy a house and they're not.
Price floors don't change that. If anything they make it worse, because most of the new cost of that comes from the middle class in the form of higher prices.
What we really need is to do something about the cost of housing, education and healthcare. And not just subsidizing it -- that's how we got into this mess to begin with. Actually reducing the underlying cost.
The alternative would be combining significant inflation with high interest rates, so that asset prices don't rise from the inflation because of the high interest rates, but wages do.
Maybe entrenched parties with lots of cash need special incentives to spur investment. I don’t know what those would be, but if all this cash is not being used to invest in public projects or new ventures, we may be witnessing the beginning of a huge socioeconomic shift.
Remember war bonds? We need road bonds. Bridge bonds. Something.
Or outsource to the shoppers: just drop the palette of stuff where it should be and let the customers find what they want.