Multiple of these points could be grouped under the general belief that "Everything is equally important". The #1 change required for growing into a senior role is to form a habit of ruthless prioritization of how you spend your time (and your team's time, if applicable).

Often you end up in situations where all of the following are true:

1. Your teammate or colleague is designing or implementing something.

2. You have different ideas about how that thing should be done.

3. Your ideas would produce an objectively better system.

4. Even though (3) is true, the improvement to the system or design isn't worth the cost in your time, team velocity, team morale/development, etc.

In that case, the right move is not to intervene, and to let your teammate design/implement the system their way. This is hard to do, because most engineers are natural maximizers[1], but for most tasks you're much better off with a satisficing[2] approach. This isn't to say that you should never give feedback on designs or in code reviews - you absolutely should, but always remember that you have a limited budget for your own time and for team morale, and you should spend that budget on the feedback where it will make the biggest difference.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maximization_(psychology)

[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satisficing