Beyond Meat Shows the World Is Changing
medium.com
medium.com
They're asserting that Beyond Meat's success is driven by millennial ethics on the back of... absolutely no data whatsoever. Who's actually buying Beyond Meat burgers? Do other generations actually not care about health, the environment, animal welfare, etc? Is there any evidence at all to justify these assertions?
Or did you just need to include the buzzword?
For older people, this took longer and is still in progress.
There are older folks interested in vegan products, but millennials are the largest current customer base so far.
Also this assumption that "older people" are less capable of using the internet is such a load of ageist nonsense. Many of us "older people" were skilfully using the internet to find things out before most millenials were twinkles in their parent's loins.
But more seriously, I'd like to see more food items available that aren't trying to imitate meat. For example there is a Samosa with chickpeas dish that they do in my company's cafeteria that is really good, contains no meat, but I don't miss the meat in that dish. It has a good mouth feel, gives an appropriate amount of energy, and fills me up throughout the afternoon. Whereas a dish containing mostly steamed vegetables (such as broccoli, carrots, and peas) or a salad typically fails to satisfy (unless you put cheese on the broccoli, or add ham or egg to the salad).
Now I can feel mostly satisfied by switching to primarily fish based meals, along with free range chicken (the ones that came from my grandma's chicken yard were really tasty). And I personally see that as more ethical / sustainable than consuming other mammals.
Stop inventing meaning where there is none. Their stock performance shows that that food shoppers accept this as another option on the shelves. That's it.
>Cannabis & Beyond Meat Shows the Future of Ethics in Consumerism
Cannabis is not about ethics. It's about people who WANT TO GET HIGH.
That's a curious word. The effects of LSD, MDMA, cocaine, heroin and weed are all described as "high", but they're very, drastically different from each other, and different people, in different life situations and psychological states, crave for different drugs.
Weed in particular is about relaxing, contemplating, slowing down and drifting off. I think that a person who wants to get high on weed is, in general, much more ethical in his subsequent actions than someone who snorts amphetamine lines or drinks shots of vodka, and that this shift in substance of choice in the last ~10 years is overall a positive change. So, it is somewhat connected to ethics.
Sure some drugs may be more harmful or addictive than another. But does a drug being more addictive or unhealthy make it less ethical? If so, then eating poorly and becoming overweight is unethical. Which seems a rather silly assertion to me.
That's stereotyping.
All sorts of people want to use cannabis, and for all sorts of reasons, including pain relief, health reasons, social lubrication, and for creativity.