Hacker News Reader

Comment by pquerna | Hacker News Reader

Hi, I'm Paul and I worked at Cloudkick / am now a Racker.

I just want to respond to one point.

  > I can't see RS buying CloudKick for internal 
  > monitoring of its own customer's servers and 
  > instances because they would already have a 
  > mature solution by now.

The intention is to use Cloudkick to monitor things like this. Rackspace has many existing internal solutions, but they have many issues that Cloudkick helps knock out, even for monitoring their internal infrastructure.

View on HN

Well if RackSpace, an industry veteran with 12 years of serving experience and $600m+ annual revenues, feels that a two-year old venture funded startup offers superior monitoring functionality than that says a lot about the company's internal processes and development priorities.

(that's not a disrespect to CloudKick, but an examination of scales of economy)

But whatever. If this is about bolstering RS's own monitoring does that mean CloudKick will no longer be monitoring 3rd party vendors?

I'm guessing CloudKick will still continue to be more than happy to monitor Amazon EC2, Linode, GoGrid, etc out of the box.

And so even if this acquisition is going to help RackSpace's own monitoring, the point still stands that RS now has a massive competitive intelligence operation going on here too. If the data is available inside the company then it even has a duty to shareholders, as a publicly listed company, to make the most out of that data to enhance profits.

Strong Disagree. Great products often have to come out of small teams and companies. Often times it's even former employees who create those comapnies and are re-acquired!

This is why Cisco acquires companies started by former Cisco employees on a regular basis that some folks have been acquired into Cisco 3 or 4 times in their careers!

Also, the competitive intelligence is not as useful as it may seem. Data for the sake of data isn't valuable. And when you figure out what they could turn it into, it doesn't seem like it would show much more than economic and market forces already show, even if CK got to scale.

Yeah that wasn't the point I was making - of course innovation rarely comes from big companies.

My observation was just if you are a $600m/year web serving infrastructure company than a core competency should be monitoring. And thus if a two year old scrappy startup can build out better monitoring, what on earth have RackSpace been building and relying on for the past 12 years?

On the competitive intelligence I think it's insanely useful for RackSpace. Down to shit like being able to monitor up-stream connectivity and routing of other providers and then being able to cross-sell their own proposition knowing the weak points of the current 3rd party solution.

What does economies of scale have to do with creating great software? Are you surprised IBM didn't create the Apple II as well?

"Well if RackSpace, an industry veteran with 12 years of serving experience and $600m+ annual revenues, feels that a two-year old venture funded startup offers superior monitoring functionality than that says a lot about the company's internal processes and development priorities."

For RackSpace, monitoring is a cost center and not a core competency.

"If the data is available inside the company then it even has a duty to shareholders, as a publicly listed company, to make the most out of that data to enhance profits."

This cliche, like most cliches, is not only annoying, it is wrong:

http://crookedtimber.org/2008/07/25/what-obligation-maximise...

Paul -- I use CK to monitor my Linode apps. Should I expect to start seeing "switch to rackspace" pitches when I login? Are you going to do anything non-anonymously with my data?

No, the Cloudkick as a monitoring/management service of all cloud providers will always remain.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com