Submitted title was "RISC-V Bitmanip Extension proposal is an education", which breaks the rule against editorializing, as well as "Please don't do things to make titles stand out [...] It's implicit in submitting something that you think it's important."
We've reverted the title to the original, which the guidelines ask us to use.
Presumably the objection is that it's not the original title. It's also an odd wording, I think "is interesting to read" might be clearer.
Click baity. It's kind of like but not quite at the level of You won't believe what the RISC-V bit manipulation extension does! Why not just cite the document's name? Bore me. Please.
In fairness to the doc, it's a rationale. It should educate.