If we were more pessimistic, we would take preventative measures seriously.
“Everyone believes the future will be worse and it’s not possible to avoid it” is a strawman, I think.
If we were more pessimistic, we would take preventative measures seriously.
“Everyone believes the future will be worse and it’s not possible to avoid it” is a strawman, I think.
Last year ABC news gave more air time to the new royal baby in a single week than they gave to climate collapse in a year. You may feel inundated with pessimism, but that is far from universal. (Source: https://www.mediamatters.org/blog/2019/05/21/ABC-News-spent-...)
I think optimism/pessimism is the wrong axis for this. It should be complacency/activism. I think MLK’s Letter from Birmingham Jail is more apt than ever.
But I think you're right that complacency/activism is a good lense to view things through. The people that accept climate change is happening remain fairly complacent. Whether this is due to insufficient pessimism or complacency, the result is the same.
Net result - the hordes are still being idiots, and the rest of the world is blundering on thinking things ain't that bad/action isn't that urgent.
I think a lot of people have given up.
Granted, the polls don’t measure apathy, but this doesn’t strike me as a society that is convinced climate change is a pressing problem. We’re more mildly concerned, and mildly supportive of policies aimed addressing it, even in a very limited way.
https://globalnews.ca/news/4811385/ottawas-unpublished-inter...