> Versus reflective schemes this actually "removes" carbon and is thus is a net gain
That is exactly what is not confirmed. It’s just a belief of the proponents.
That is exactly what is not confirmed. It’s just a belief of the proponents.
There are some natural experiments: the Sahara feeds the Amazon, and the Gobi feeds the Pacific ... Perhaps more directed seeding would be more beneficial. We will never know unless we actually study, or try.
It is well known that in the normal conditions various bacteria degrade organic matter, which means nothing "dead" would really remain at the bottom. Typically all decomposing produces CO2 again.