How much climate change can still be considered safe?
twitter.com
twitter.com
Maybe we need to explain it to people like cancer treatment: if we'd caught it early, maybe chemotherapy alone would have been sufficient. Today, we need invasive surgery, plus chemo, plus radiation therapy, and we also need to hope that untested immunotherapy treatments will work.
If we continue to leave it untreated, then our prognosis is very grim indeed. We won't die immediately, but our cancer will be inoperable.
At the individual level the only option seems to be to brace for impact. Maybe move to colder regions of the globe. Or enjoy the present.
No individual, no civilization, no species are immortal. Our extinction is in the order of things. What is most upsetting, maybe, is it's our own fault and that, in theory, we could have prevented it (just like a smoker who didn't stop smoking while there was still time).
[0] can't remember where I've heard that
So while I agree with you that I care about ny children and grand-children, I don't see this as being a mainstream thought.
A good, free, and quick primer is just searching for “uninhabitable earth”. He talks about the real world implications and impacts for various levels of warming.
Some parts of the earth are expected to become more inhabitable with extra 1-2 °C. India is not one of them.
https://media.treehugger.com/assets/images/2013/05/mauna-loa...