It is simply the original bitcoin protocol, ie. with all the stupid things that were added to "BTC" since 2009 removed.
... that makes it infinitely scalable and useful like bitcoin was supposed to be, not just for money, for data storage, and for computation.
No Segwit No RBF No block size limit No limits on scripts or data sizes
BTC is useless in comparison... and the 'ad hominem' will only cover this up for so long.
Bitcoin SV clearly introduced many changes. But those changes are backward-incompatible for Bitcoin nodes, meaning that every one of them will reject an SV block.
It really doesn't matter what you think about the wisdom of what was added since 2009. All that matters is that Bitcoin nodes will ignore the blocks.
Experimentation is all well and good. But fringe groups breaking the protocol willy-nilly then claiming the result as Bitcoin is misleading at best.
That's what I was pointing out. It's a tactic used repeatedly by SV advocates including Wright. His involvement is relevant given the extraordinary nature of his claims and the deliberately misleading nature of his proof.
> No Segwit No RBF No block size limit No limits on scripts or data sizes
Scaling is so very easy when users are scarce.