> Durable isn't timeless ... for that product looks pretty average.
The design can be timeless without the design being beautiful. The design is more than its appearance.
The design can be timeless without the design being beautiful. The design is more than its appearance.
(I'm joking because even so-called timeless designs might look pretty out of place if you send them back far enough)
What looks good to 5/10 people, might not look good to the other 5/10. For an instance, consider an iPhone 4S. It is a pretty average design "aesthetically" IMO. But the phone did extraordinarily well because it was a well engineered phone. Another example is this website that you're looking at. I would call this average aesthetics as well.
Of course good aesthetics is an awesome add-on, but it is not fair to disqualify a product based on just aesthetics.
I have heard multiple people unironically call it the sexiest phone they’ve ever seen.