I'm sorry and I hope it gets better. Here is one article, as a source, its long though. Source: https://nacla.org/news/2018/05/18/united-states%E2%80%99-han...
"The first UN rapporteur to visit Venezuela for 21 years has told The Independent the US sanctions on the country are illegal and could amount to “crimes against humanity” under international law.
Former special rapporteur Alfred de Zayas, who finished his term at the UN in March, has criticized the US for engaging in “economic warfare” against Venezuela which he said is hurting the economy and killing Venezuelans."
Per the Indpendent: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/venezuela-...
"Socialism was working too well, it brought huge swathes of the population out of poverty. A working less-capitalist model being dangerous to the global status quo, had to go."
This is ideological drivel so far removed from reality, it's basically trolling.
Source: https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/americanexperience/features/reagan-...
If you'd please review https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html and stick to the rules from now on, that would be good.
If Venezuela's form of socialism was working so well, then it should have sustained itself no matter what the US did. Instead it was supported by oil money, and as soon as the oil dollars were cut off it collapsed because there was nothing revolutionary or innovative about it. I'll be voting for Andrew Yang this primary because I like the idea of UBI and a social safety net and how he's planning to implement his policies. I think that form of 21st century socialism might work - the form that Venezuela chose just led to cronyism and oppression.
Good domestic policy makes you impervious to interference by foreign powers with 40x your GDP?
I don’t get it, what’s the logic there?